论文部分内容阅读
《侵权责任法》第36条第2款的规定被称为“通知规则”。在“宜粗不宜细”、忽视言论自由和利益平衡的立法理念下,该规则存在欠缺通知内容与形式的规定、忽视公民言论自由的保障、网络服务者审查义务过重等诸多问题,进而导致该规则原本的立法目的不能在司法实践中有效体现。因此,立法者需要更新立法理念,通过修订法律和发布司法解释等方式,确保言论自由与权利保障并重,实现网络用户与网络服务提供者利益平衡的效果。
The provisions of article 36, paragraph 2, of the Tort Liability Act are referred to as “notification rules ”. Under the legislative concept of “appropriateness should not be fine” and ignored the freedom of speech and the balance of interests, there are many problems such as the lack of rules and regulations on content and form of notification, the protection of citizens’ freedom of speech and the excessive obligation of Internet service providers to review, Which in turn leads to the original legislative purpose of the rule can not be effectively reflected in judicial practice. Therefore, legislators need to update their legislative concepts and ensure that the freedom of expression and the protection of rights are equalized through the revision of laws and the publication of judicial interpretations so as to achieve the effect of balancing the interests of the network users and the network service providers.