基于多学科的运动处方在心肌梗死PCI术后患者中的应用

来源 :中华现代护理杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:chengbocc
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨基于多学科的运动处方在心肌梗死PCI术后患者中的应用效果。方法:采取便利抽样法,选取新乡市中心医院2019年1月—2020年1月收治的120例心肌梗死PCI术后患者为研究对象,根据随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,每组各60例。对照组采取常规PCI术后护理,观察组在常规护理的基础上采用基于多学科的运动处方进行干预。比较两组患者的运动耐力和心肺功能。结果:观察组干预后3、6个月的6 min步行距离均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(n P<0.01)。观察组患者干预后6个月的左心室射血分数、无氧阈、峰值摄氧量、代谢当量均高于对照组,左心室舒张末期内径低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(n P<0.01)。n 结论:基于多学科的运动处方可增强心肌梗死PCI术后患者运动耐力,改善其心肺功能。“,”Objective:To explore the effects of multidisciplinary exercise prescription in patients with myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) .Methods:Totally 120 patients with myocardial infarction undergoing PCI admitted at Xinxiang Central Hospital from January 2019 to January 2020 were selected by convenient sampling and divided into a control group and an observation group according to the random number table, with 60 patients in each group. Patients in the control group received routine nursing after PCI, while patients in the observation group underwent multidisciplinary exercise prescription on this basis. The exercise tolerance and cardiopulmonary function were compared between the two groups of patients.Results:The 6-min walking distance in the observation group was higher than that in the control group both 3 and 6 months after intervention, and the difference was statistically significant (n P<0.01) . The left ventricular ejection fraction, anaerobic threshold, peak oxygen uptake, and metabolic equivalent of the observation group were higher than those of the control group 6 months after intervention, and the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was lower than that of the control group, with statistically significant differences (n P<0.01) .n Conclusions:Multidisciplinary exercise prescription can enhance exercise tolerance and improve cardiopulmonary function in patients with myocardial infarction after PCI.
其他文献
目的:探讨糖尿病专科护士主导的胰岛素泵管理在老年糖尿病患者中的应用效果。方法:采用便利抽样法选择2019年1月—2020年12月在首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院老年科住院期间使用胰岛素泵的149例2型糖尿病患者,其中2019年1—12月患者为对照组(71例),2020年1—12月患者为观察组(78例)。住院胰岛素泵使用期间,两组分别采取常规胰岛素泵管理和以糖尿病专科护士为主导的胰岛素泵管理。比较两组的血糖波动系数、血糖达标时间、胰岛素泵相关负性事件及患者胰岛素泵相关知识及技能水平。结果:观察组的血糖波动系数