本期发表的一组关于广义修辞学的专栏文章,可以从学术互文性的角度来阅读。其中一篇文章的一些话语碎片,似可援引,忝充主持人语:“中国修辞学研究有域外参照,更有深厚的历史积淀和本土传统。如果丢弃参照坐标,可能找不准自己的位置;如果割断传统学脉,也就屏蔽了当代修辞学的历史记忆。20世纪以来,中国修辞学几代学者的学术接力,有 A series of column articles on general rhetoric published in this issue can be read from the perspective of academic intertextuality. Some of the discourse fragments of an article may be quoted as a proposition: ”There is an extraterritorial reference to the study of Chinese rhetoric, more profound historical accumulation and indigenous traditions. If you discard the reference coordinates, you may not find yourself If we cut off the traditional arteries, we will block the historical memory of contemporary rhetoric. Since the 20th century, the academic relay of several generations of Chinese rhetoric scholars has