迈娜·杰海伦 看来,迈娜·杰海伦的《阿基米德与女权主义批评的悖论》一文已经引起美国众多女权主义批评家的极大兴趣。该文发表于1981年夏,两次被收入选集中。杰海伦在这篇论文里固然讨论了有关重大问题,但实际上她却致力于讨论“鉴赏性阅读和政治性阅读”之间的矛盾关系。杰海伦不仅在女权主义批评领域碰到了这种基本问题,而且把它称作整个女权主义研究中的“激进的比较主义(radical comparativism)”。在她看来,由斯帕克斯、莫尔斯、肖沃尔特、吉尔伯特和古芭等人所写的以妇女为中心的批评著作由于将全部注意力集中在妇女文学传统上而遭到损害。杰海伦说,竟然有人想建立“一个女子语境(contaxt),亦即建立一个远离男人主观臆想的女子语言王国”,对此她感到痛惜。她希望妇女文学的研究应当拓宽视野“从妇女自身的观点出发去研究一切事物”,杰海伦的这张蓝图不仅显得雄心勃勃,而且也显得力度不凡。事实上,女权主 It appears to Miner Jayhalen that the text of “The Paradox of Archimedes and Feminist Criticism” by Mainer Gehlen has drawn the great interest of many feminist critics in the United States. The article was published in the summer of 1981, twice by the income of the election. Although Jie Helun discussed major issues in this essay, she actually devoted himself to discussing the contradiction between “appreciation reading and political reading.” Jie Helun not only encountered this basic problem in the field of feminist criticism, but also referred to it as “radical comparativism” in the study of feminism. In her view, the criticism of women-centered criticism written by Sparks, Morse, Shoval, Gilbert and Cuba is undermined by the fact that it focuses all the attention on women’s literary traditions . Jie Helun said she was deplored by anyone trying to establish “a contaxt, a woman’s language kingdom far away from men’s subjective conjecture.” She hoped that the study of women’s literature should broaden its horizons “to study everything from the women’s point of view.” This blueprint for Jie Helun not only looked ambitious but also extraordinary. In fact, the feminist