论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨宫腔镜无痛人工流产术的适用范围及疗效。方法选择2011年6月至2012年5月要求终止妊娠的患者1400例,随机分为两组,宫腔镜组700例采用宫腔镜无痛人工流产术,负压吸引组给予超导可视负压吸引人工流产术,比较两组漏吸、吸宫不全发生率、出血量及并发症。结果宫腔镜组漏吸率0、吸宫不全发生率0.14%、出血量(5±2)ml、子宫穿孔率0,均低于负压吸引组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论宫腔镜人工流产较超导可视负压吸引人工流产效果更佳,值得临床推广。
Objective To investigate the applicability and efficacy of hysteroscopic painless abortion. Methods One hundred and seventy-four patients who required termination of pregnancy from June 2011 to May 2012 were randomly divided into two groups. Hysteroscopic painless abortion (700 cases) was performed in hysteroscopic group, and superconducting visualization Negative pressure to attract artificial abortion, compared two groups of leakage, the incidence of incomplete suction, bleeding and complications. Results The hysteroscopic leak rate was 0, the incidence of incomplete uterine suction was 0.14%, the bleeding volume was (5 ± 2) ml, the uterine perforation rate was lower than that of negative pressure group (P <0.05) ). Conclusion Hysteroscopic induced abortion is more effective than superconducting visual vacuum to attract induced abortion, which is worthy of clinical promotion.