论文部分内容阅读
引言为有效探求具体案件中法律的内在含义,使法律得以正确适用,学者们研究出了一系列的法律解释方法,包括文义解释、体系解释、法意解释(历史解释)、目的解释、当然解释、反对解释、合宪性解释、社会学解释、比较法解释等。然而,仅仅依靠这些解释方法却无力实现法律解释学的既定目标:当运用不同解释方法出现不同解释论点时,尚缺乏一套决定取
INTRODUCTION In order to effectively explore the inherent meaning of law in specific cases and to make the law applicable properly, scholars have developed a series of methods of legal interpretation, including literary interpretation, system explanation, legal interpretation (historical explanation), purposeful interpretation, of course Interpretation, opposition to interpretation, constitutional interpretation, sociological interpretation, comparative law interpretation. However, relying solely on these explanations fails to achieve the stated goal of legal hermeneutics: a set of decisions is lacking when different interpretations of different interpretations arise