《侵权责任法》36条规定了网络用户或网络服务者的自己责任及网络服务者的连带责任,为实践中存在的很多富有争议的网络侵权案件提供了法律依据。但是由于法律规范的原则性,本条在实务中将遇到很多操作性难题,例如知道含义模糊,通知制度缺乏操作性,连带责任的性质及必要措施理解有争议等问题,本文从这些问题入手,分析问题并提出自己的建议,以期完善《侵权责任法》36条规定的网络侵权责任,使网络侵权这样一个新型的侵权形态能够在在侵权法的框架下得到很好的规制。 Article 36 of Tort Liability Law stipulates the responsibility of network users or network service providers and the joint and several liability of network service providers and provides the legal basis for many controversial network infringement cases existing in practice. However, due to the principle of legal norms, this section will encounter many operational problems in practice, such as vagueness in knowing, lack of operability in the notification system, the nature of joint and several liability and necessary measures to understand controversial issues. Starting from these problems, Analyze the problem and put forward my own suggestion in order to improve the liability of internet infringement stipulated in Article 36 of Tort Liability Act so that a new type of infringement such as internet infringement can be well regulated under the framework of tort law.