一一个奥秘中国报业史或新文艺运动史的研究者在回顾三十年代时,可能会发现这么一种奇特的现象:许多具有反动政治背景及倾向的报纸,其文艺副刊的编辑方针往往并不同该报社论亦步亦趋,有时甚至会背道而驰——即是说,同一家报纸,在社论及新闻处理上把实行不抵抗主义的南京蒋政权捧为神明,又在侵略者已跨进关内时还满口“友邦”;然而它的文艺副刊上却洒着东北人民的血泪,声嘶力竭地呐喊着:不当奴隶,要抵抗。这究竟是怎么一回事呢?我是 A Mystery A researcher in the history of the Chinese press or the history of the new literature and art during the retrospective of the thirties may find such a peculiar phenomenon that many newspapers with reactionary political backgrounds and tendencies often have editorial guidelines for literary supplements It is not the same as the newspaper’s editorial and sometimes even runs counter to its claims - that is, the same newspaper holds that the Chiang Kai-shek administration in Nanjing, which practices non-resistance in editorials and news processing, is a god and that when the aggressors have stepped in Full of mouth “AIA ”; However, its literary supplements but shed tears of blood on the northeast people, scream hoarsely: improper slaves, to resist. What the hell is this all about? I am