论文部分内容阅读
目的比较常规穿刺术与中心静脉导管引流治疗胸腔积液的临床效果。方法胸腔积液患者50例,按照治疗方案分为对照组和观察组,对照组采用常规穿刺引流术,观察组采用中心静脉导管引流,比较两组疗效及并发症发生率。结果观察组总有效率达到92.0%(23/25),明显高于对照组68.0%(17/25);并发症发生率4.0%,明显低于对照组24.0%,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论胸腔积液治疗中应用中心静脉导管引流疗效优于常规穿刺术,且并发症发生率更低,临床推广应用价值显著。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of routine puncture and central venous drainage in the treatment of pleural effusion. Methods Fifty patients with pleural effusion were divided into control group and observation group according to the treatment protocol. The control group was treated by conventional puncture and drainage. The observation group was treated with central venous catheter drainage. The curative effect and complication rate were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 92.0% (23/25), significantly higher than that of the control group (68.0%, 17/25). The incidence of complications was 4.0%, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (24.0%), the differences were statistically significant P <0.05). Conclusions The application of central venous catheter drainage in the treatment of pleural effusion is superior to the conventional puncture, and the complication rate is lower and the value of clinical application is significant.