论文部分内容阅读
费尔巴哈认为宗教的本质是人的本质的异化,而上帝就是人格化的“类”。费尔巴哈的“类”包括思维力、意志力以及心力。马克思曾多次提到过“类本质”和“类本质异化”的说法。这与费尔巴哈的类本质有一定的相似之处,但二者之间却存在着原则上的差异。本文着重比较分析马克思与费尔巴哈“类本质”思想的异同之处,从而更趋近了解马克思的“类本质”思想。
Feuerbach believes that the nature of religion is the alienation of human nature, and that God is the personified “class ”. Feuerbach’s “class ” includes the power of thinking, willpower and effort. Marx once mentioned many times the notion of “category nature” and “category alienation”. This has some similarities with the nature of Feuerbach, but there is a fundamental difference between the two. This article focuses on a comparative analysis of the similarities and differences between Marx and Feuerbach ’s theory of “essence of nature”, so as to get closer to understanding Marx’ s “essence of essence”.