论文部分内容阅读
当代文学迄今已走过六十余年历史,现在可以并且应该考虑学科的历史化问题了,历史化有一个文献史料问题,也离不开文献史料的支撑。长期以来,主导当代文学学科的基本取向是轻“史料实证”而重“理论阐释”。这种现象在相当程度上助长了当代文学研究的空疏学风,给该学科的进一步提升和发展留下了不少的后遗症。为此有必要强调和提出“当代文学文献史料学”问题,在研究思路、格局、向度和方法上进行一次带有革命性意义的重要“战略转移”。当代文学文献史料存在方式主要有三种,也许现在还不俱备将历史还给历史的足够条件,但只要理性对待,仍可作出属于我们的历史贡献。
Contemporary literature has gone through more than sixty years of history so far. Now it is possible and should take account of the historicization of the subject. There is a question of the historical materialization of the historical materialization and the support of historical documents. For a long time, the basic orientation of the contemporary literature discipline is that of “historical evidence” and “theoretical interpretation.” To a certain extent, this phenomenon has contributed to the sparse study style of contemporary literature, which has left a lot of sequelae to the further promotion and development of this subject. Therefore, it is necessary to emphasize and put forward the issue of “historical materials of contemporary literary literature” and carry out a revolutionary “strategic shift” in research ideas, patterns, dimensions and methods. There are three main ways in which historical documents of contemporary literature exist, and perhaps they are not yet sufficient conditions for returning history to history. However, as long as they are treated rationally, they can still make historical contributions that belong to us.