前不久,有权威文章说,律师应对WTO挑战的首要原则,当是以社会需求为导向的原则。不久前,又有权威人士讲,“中国目前90％的刑事、民事、行政等各类诉讼案件没有律师参与,北京市的这一比率更高些。”尽管我们可以辩护说,律师业务并非只是诉讼业务。但无论如何,还是令人感到“导向原则”与“90％现象”之间的“反差”也太大了些。这“反差”说明了什么?说明“秋菊”们喜欢单打独斗去讨“说法”?怕是不能这样说。而此时此刻能说该说的是,与其原则说说导向原则,倒不如为“90％现象”把把脉、导导向,来个虚功实做——其实照直说来,大抵围绕“贵”、“贱”、“高”、“低”这四个字说说即可。 Not long ago, there were authoritative articles saying that the lawyer’s primary principle in tackling the WTO challenge should be the principle guided by social needs. Not long ago, another authoritative source said: “At present, 90% of China’s criminal, civil, administrative and other litigation cases involve no lawyer, and this ratio in Beijing is even higher.” Although we can defend that lawyers’ practice is not just Litigation business. In any event, however, it still makes sense that the “contrast” between the “guiding principle” and the “90% phenomenon” is too large. What does this “contrast” mean? Explain that “Chrysanthemums” like to go it alone to discuss “sayings”, afraid they can not say that. What we can say at this moment is that instead of telling the guiding principles of principles, we should give the “pulse of the phenomenon of 90%” and guide it to a virtual reality - in fact, , “Cheap”, “high”, “low” words can be said.