李翰文章中讲三大战役的那段话,我们在编辑过程中注意到了。是删掉还是保留?删很容易,也避免给我们找麻烦。前些年期刊评审,挑的都是类似“政治”问题。发稿时我们选择了保留,在编者按中也没有就此发表意见。因为期刊是个平台,持有这种想法的年轻教师绝不是少数,你删除这些观点不等于它就不存在了。我们估计认真阅读的读者会注意到,也必然会有人写文章辩驳。如果这样,会有利于教师专业素质的提高。以现在的宽松环境,讨论类似问题不至于获罪。请读者仔细看陈杰老师的文章。 Li Han article stresses that the three campaigns, we noted in the editing process. Erase or retain? Delete is easy, but also to avoid trouble for us. A few years ago journals review, pick are similar to the “political” issue. At the time of writing, we chose to retain and did not comment on the press. Because journals are a platform, there are by no means minority young teachers who hold this idea, and deleting them does not mean that it does not exist. We estimate that readers who read carefully will notice that somebody is bound to write an article to rebut. If so, it will be conducive to the improvement of the professional quality of teachers. With the present relaxed environment, discussing similar issues will not lead to conviction. Please read carefully the reader Chen Jie’s article.