Hemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shock

来源 :重症医学(英文) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition characterized by acute end-organ hypoperfusion due to inadequate cardiac output that can result in multiorgan failure, which may lead to death. The diminished cardiac output in CS leads to systemic hypoperfusion and maladaptive cycles of ischemia, inflammation, vasoconstriction, and volume overload. Obviously, the optimal management of CS needs to be readjusted in view of the predominant dysfunction, which may be guided by hemodynamic monitoring. Hemodynamic monitoring enables (1) characterization of the type of cardiac dysfunction and the degree of its severity, (2) very early detection of associated vasoplegia, (3) detection and monitoring of organ dysfunction and tissue oxygenation, and (4) guidance of the introduction and optimization of inotropes and vasopressors as well as the timing of mechanical support. It is now well documented that early recognition, classification, and precise phenotyping via early hemodynamic monitoring (e.g., echocardiography, invasive arterial pressure, and the evaluation of organ dysfunction and parameters derived from central venous catheterization) improve patient outcomes. In more severe disease, advanced hemodynamic monitoring with pulmonary artery catheterization and the use of transpulmonary thermodilution devices is useful to facilitate the right timing of the indication, weaning from mechanical cardiac support, and guidance on inotropic treatments, thus helping to reduce mortality. In this review, we detail the different parameters relevant to each monitoring approach and the way they can be used to support optimal management of these patients.

其他文献
Cardiogenicshock(CS)isaleadingcauseofmortalityworldwide.CSpresentationandmanagementinthecurrenterahavebeenwidelydepictedinepidemiologicalstudies.Itstreatmentiscodifiedandreliesonmedicalcareandextracorporeallifesupport(ECLS)inthebridgetorecovery,chronicmec
Resuscitationofsepticshockisacomplexissuebecausethecardiovasculardisturbancesthatcharacterizesepticshockvaryfromonepatienttoanotherandcanalsochangeovertimeinthesamepatient.Therefore,differenttherapies(fluids,vasopressors,andinotropes)shouldbeindividuallya
Theapoptosisrepressorwithcaspaserecruitmentdomain(ARC)playsacriticalroleinextrinsicapoptosisinitiationviadeathreceptorligands,physiologicalstress,infectionresponseinatissue-dependentmanner,endoplasmicreticulum(ER)stress,genotoxicdrugs,ionizingradiation,ox
Leftventricularassistdevice(LVAD)therapyiswell-establishedinthetreatmentofend-stagecardiacfailure.Indicationsarebridgetotransplant(BTT),bridgetocandidacy(BTC),bridgetorecovery(BTR),anddestinationtherapy(DT).Thedurabilityandadverseevent(AE)rateofLVADshavei
Cardiogenicshock(CS)isacomplexclinicalsyndromewithahighmortalityrate.Itcanoccurtoduetomultipleetiologiesofcardiovasculardiseaseandisphenotypicallyheterogeneous.Acutemyocardialinfarction-relatedCS(AMI-CS)hashistoricallybeenthemostprevalentcause,andthus,res