论文部分内容阅读
目的通过对本院接受尿常规检查患者的检查情况进行回顾性分析,探讨尿常规检验中尿分析仪器和常规化学法的检验效果。方法选择本院2013年1月至2016年1月接受尿常规检查的患者作为研究对象,一共120例,随机分组为观察组和对照组,各组为60例,对照组采用常规化学法进行检查,观察组采用尿分析仪器进行检查。比较两组患者的检验结果,包括尿蛋白、白细胞、红细胞。结果两组患者尿蛋白、白细胞、红细胞的阳性检出率无明显差异,不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论尿常规检验中尿分析仪和常规化学法的检验结果相当,两种方法各自具有优缺点,不能互相代替,建议联合使用,能够有效发挥互补的作用。
Objective To conduct a retrospective analysis of the examination of patients undergoing routine urinalysis in our hospital to investigate the urine test results of urinalysis instruments and conventional chemical methods. Methods A total of 120 patients who underwent routine urine tests from January 2013 to January 2016 in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group, 60 cases in each group. The control group was examined by routine chemical method The observation group used urinalysis instrument to check. The test results of two groups of patients were compared, including urinary protein, white blood cells and erythrocytes. Results There was no significant difference in the positive detection rate of urinary protein, leucocyte and erythrocyte between the two groups, which was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). Conclusion Urine analyzer urine test and routine chemical test results quite, the two methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, can not replace each other, it is recommended to use, can effectively play a complementary role.