时下学界有一种看法,认为政府补贴农业是政府对农民的照顾。多年来学界一直这么说,人云亦云,久而久之很多人也就信以为真。我自己早就感觉这看法不对,但却又不知究竟错在哪里。这些日子思来想去,终于理出了一些头绪。并不是这问题有多么尖端,恰恰相反,是因为问题浅,人们往往不从复杂的层面去考虑。我读过一些学者的文章,说到政府为何补贴农业几乎众口一词,都说农业是弱质产业,比较收益低。我的疑问是,为何农业会 Nowadays, there is a view in the academic community that the government subsidizes agriculture to take care of the peasants by the government. For many years, the academic circles have said so, so many people believe that over time. I myself already felt that this view was wrong, but I did not know what was wrong. These days thinking about going, finally figured out some clue. This is not how sophisticated the issue is. On the contrary, it is because of the shallowness of the question that people often do not consider it from a complex level. I read some scholars’ essay. When it comes to why the government subsidizes almost all the words of agriculture, they all say that agriculture is a weak industry and its income is relatively low. My question is why agriculture will