论文部分内容阅读
2004年3月23日,在西安市6000万元即开型体育彩票销售现场,家住西安市临潼区农村,今年18岁的刘亮,手持刮出的草花 K 图案彩票,上台要求兑取特等奖。在按程序进行了二次抽奖后,公证人员宣布他中的是特等奖A奖:一辆价值近48万元的宝马轿车和12万元现金。随后主办方请刘亮坐上宝马轿车,披红戴花上街巡游宣传。3月24日,刘亮领奖时被质疑彩票的真伪,兑奖暂缓。25日,刘亮索要宝马车未果,爬上广告牌意欲自杀。26日上午,国家体彩管理中心等部门鉴定确认:刘亮这张中奖彩票系由草花2涂改而成的假票。次日。刘亮及其家人在家中也召开了新闻发布会,称假彩票决不是刘亮伪造,所谓的假彩票不是刘亮原来的彩票。到底是谁做了假?西安城里为此案已吵得沸沸扬扬,不同版本的“案件结论”充斥坊间。忠厚者担忧,尖刻者嘲讽,即便最冷漠的人也不能不侧目。5月8日,最新案情惊爆:承包商杨永明供认造假内幕,四个中奖者除了刘亮都是托儿!真相看来已浮出水面,但距离尘埃落定还有时日,人声鼎沸之势必将继续。但是,在坊间评说里,在法律工作者专业分析中,我们听不到公证应有的声音,却看到了大众甚至法律专家们对公证的漠视与公证制度本身存在的缺陷。——笔者
On March 23, 2004, in Xi’an, 60 million yuan open sports lottery sales scene, who lives in Lintong District, Xi’an, rural areas, 18-year-old Liu Liang, hand-held grass K-draw the lottery, came to power to redeem the grand prize . After a two-time lottery according to the procedure, a notary public announces that he is Grand Prize A Prize: a BMW sedan worth nearly 480,000 yuan and 120,000 yuan in cash. Then the organizers invited Liu Liang to get on the BMW sedan, Phi Dai wearing flower parade. March 24, Liu Liang was questioned when winning the prize lottery authenticity, Duijiang suspended. On the 25th, Liu Liang claimed the BMW car failed to climb the billboard intended to commit suicide. On the morning of the 26th, the National Sports Lottery Management Center and other departments appraised and confirmed: Liu Liang’s winning lottery ticket was drafted from Caohua 2. The next day. Liu Liang and his family also held a press conference at home, saying that the fake lottery is not forged by Liu Liang. The so-called false lottery ticket is not Liu Liang’s original lottery ticket. In the end who made a fake? Xi’an city for the case has been uproarious, different versions of “case conclusion ” filled the shop. Loyal people worry, sharp-edged ridicule, even the most indifferent people can not ignore. May 8, the latest case of shock: contractor Yang Yongming confession false insider, in addition to Liu Liang four winners are child care! The truth seems to have surfaced, but the distance is still some time to settle, voices It is bound to continue. However, we can not hear the notarial reason in the professional analysis of legal workers, but we can see that the public and even legal experts ignore the notarization and the defects of the notarial system itself. --author