论文部分内容阅读
“许可”是知识产权交易的主要方式。在“标準必要专利”(Standard-Essential PatentS,下称SEP专利)出现之前,许可从法律性质上可分为“一般许可”和“强制许可”。1随着技术及经济全球化的不斷发展,SEP专利应运而生;并由此产生SEP专利的许可及与之相关的争议。此类争议常涉及所谓FRAND(Fair,Reasonable and Non-discriminatoryTermS)条款的适用问题。主要体现在两个方面:一是对SEP专利许可法律性质的认识;二是如何适用FRAND条款。
“Permit ” is the main method of intellectual property transaction. Prior to the advent of “Standard-Essential Patent S”, SEPA was legally classified as “General Permit” and “Compulsory License”. 1 With the continuous development of technology and economic globalization, the SEP patent came into being; as a result, the licensing of the SEP patent and the related controversies. Such disputes often involve the application of the so-called FRAND (Fair, Reasonable and Non-discriminatoryTermS) clause. Mainly reflected in two aspects: First, the legal nature of SEP patent license awareness; second is how to apply FRAND terms.