论文部分内容阅读
票据质押作为一种重要的融资手段,被我国《票据法》和《物权法》所承认。由于票据权利不同于其它的权利财产,两个法律文件的规定存在一定差异,在质押权的成立、质押权的效力以及质押权的实现等方面产生了如何适用的问题。基于两法的立法目的不同,依据两法所成立的票据质押并不冲突,属于不同的法律制度范畴,但在法律适用上有所不同。
Pledged bills as an important means of financing, by our “bills” and “Property Law” recognized. Because the rights of negotiable instruments are different from those of other rights and interests, there are some differences between the provisions of the two legal documents. The problems arise in the application of the hypothecation, the effectiveness of the hypothec and the realization of the hypothec. The purpose of legislation based on the two laws is different. The pledges of bills established by the two laws do not conflict. They fall into the categories of different legal systems but differ in the application of law.