论文部分内容阅读
在「中级医刊」里有问题解答栏,按理说这应当是为读者解决疑难问题和提高中级医务人员的良好方式,它应当向读者们介绍正确的理论,对于一些糊涂观念予以驳斥,但在「中级医刊」的问题解答栏中却存在着一些值得纠正的错误理论,因此我觉得有提出来加以讨论的必要。因为我是一个实验诊断工作者,所以也希望在「中级医刊」的问题解答栏中得到一些有关本身业务的知识,但失望得很,在阅读过程中却发现了一些奇怪的理论,在本质上存在着严重的错误.在解答有关实验诊断问题的解答者中,常见的是曾玉明先生,今将他在问题解答中的错误就我所觉察到的列举于下。一、1954年第六号,64页郭佩琛问:「溶血
It should be said that this should be a good way for readers to solve difficult problems and improve mid-level medical staff. It should introduce readers to the correct theories and refute some confused ideas. However, There are some mistaken theories that are worth correcting in the question column of the “Intermediate Journal of Medicine”, so I think it is necessary to discuss it. Because I am an experimental diagnostic worker, I also hope that I could get some knowledge about my own business in the Q & A column of the Intermediate Medical Journal. However, I was disappointed. During the reading process, I found some weird theories. In essence, There are serious mistakes in the answer to the questions on experimental diagnosis of the solution, it is common to Mr. Zeng Yuming, now his mistake in the problem-solving as I perceive the list below. I. No. 6, 1954, page 64 Guo Peichen asked: "Hemolysis