论文部分内容阅读
《侵权责任法》第20条所规定的获利返还请求权与侵权损害赔偿请求权存在密切联系。获利返还请求权是为克服侵权损害赔偿不足而产生的,但获利返还请求权不能为侵权损害赔偿所替代,其有独立的理论基础与适用条件。获利返还请求权也不是受害人损害数额的计算方法,也不宜以是否可以赔偿损害作为返还获利的先决条件。获利返还请求权在性质上属于独立的请求权类型,当事人可以选择依据获利返还请求权或者侵权损害赔偿请求权提出请求,但二者不能同时适用。
Article 20 of the Tort Liability Law provides that the right to claim for the return of profits is closely linked to the right to claim damages for damages. The right to claim the return of profits is to overcome the lack of compensation for the infringement resulting, but the right to claim the return of profits can not be replaced by tort damages, which have an independent theoretical basis and applicable conditions. The claim for the return of profits is not a method of calculating the amount of damage done to the victims nor is it a precondition for the possibility of compensation for damages as a profit-making return. In the nature of the request for the right to return the claim belongs to an independent type of claim, the parties may choose to claim the right to return or tort claim, but the two can not be applied at the same time.