论文部分内容阅读
主持人:最近,云南的一起“奸杀少女摔死男童”案由一审的死刑改判为死缓,引发了又一场舆论的悍然大波和公众的强烈质疑。人们将此案与“药家鑫案”的性质进行比较并发出追问:为何不判死刑?判决书为何不写清不杀理由?不杀是否在放纵犯罪?我们先来看看案情。李昌奎与受害人王
Moderator: Recently, a case of committing a murder of a girl to a boy with a crime in Yunnan was commuted to death by a death sentence in the first instance, provoking a blatant wave of public opinion and a strong questioning from the public. People compare the case with the nature of the “Pharmacy Xin case” and issue a questioning: Why not sentence to death? Why not write the verdicts do not kill the reason why the verdict? Do not kill the indulgence of crime? Let us look at the case first. Li Changkui and the victim Wang