论文部分内容阅读
通过对内蒙古哈民忙哈遗址人骨死亡年龄的统计与分析,得出该群体的年龄结构框架:房址内人骨的平均死亡年龄为26.8岁,男性平均死亡年龄为34.3岁,女性的平均死亡年龄为30.6岁;群体的死亡高峰期集中在未成年期、壮年期和中年期,无老年期个体;F40与其他房址居民总体平均死亡年龄比较接近(26.2岁<27.7岁),各个年龄段的死亡率上略有差异,F40相对于其他房址,个体死亡年龄上表现出更为集中的分布特点。哈民组与喇家组和庙子沟组的年龄结构比较结果显示,哈民组与庙子沟组有着更相似的年龄构成,从而反映出在这3个史前灾难遗址的成因方面,哈民忙哈遗址与庙子沟遗址之间存在着明显的共性,即均可能与某种急性传染病(瘟疫)的突然爆发有关。F40人骨堆积应为古代人类有意识将遗骸逐次拖入房内,集中堆放而形成。其他房址鉴于死者狰狞的体态和随身佩戴玉器的证据,房内人骨堆积很可能是个体死后的原始场景。
Through the statistics and analysis of the age of human bone death at the site of Businha, Haimin, Inner Mongolia, the age structure of the group was obtained: the average age of death of the human bone in the site was 26.8 years, the average age of death of the male was 34.3 years, and the average age of death of the female Was 30.6 years old. The peak of death was concentrated in adolescence, middle-aged, and middle-aged. The average death age of F40 was similar to that of other residents (26.2 years <27.7 years old) Slightly different mortality rate, F40 relative to other sites, the individual’s death showed a more concentrated distribution of age characteristics. The age structure comparison between the Haman Group and the Lajia Group and the Miaizigou Group shows that the Haomin Group and the Miaozigou Formation have a similar age composition, which reflects that in the causes of these three prehistoric disaster sites, There are obvious commonalities between the sites of busy ha ha and the site of Miaizigou, which may both be related to the sudden outbreak of some acute infectious disease (plague). F40 human bone accumulation should be the ancient human consciousness will be successively dragged into the remains of the room, the accumulation of concentrated form. Other House Given the body of the deceased and evidence of wearing jade, the bones in the room may well have been the original scenes of individuals after death.