论文部分内容阅读
法律诠释学在法学方法论上的重要性已经是有目共睹:如拉伦茨教授对法律解释过程中“诠释学循环”结构的揭示、埃塞尔教授对法律推理过程中“前理解”的发掘、考夫曼教授通过类推展开的对传统以演绎为核心的三段论的批判……~([1])然而,诠释学下的法律究竟是一种什么样的构造,在法律实践中诠释学的立场究竟具有何种价值?德沃金对传统法律理论的批判和拆构以及对法律诠释结构的发掘给我们以极大的启发和促进,如
The importance of legal hermeneutics in jurisprudence has been evident to all: as Professor Larenz reveals the structure of the Hermeneutic Cycle in the process of legal interpretation, Professor Essel's interpretation of the “pre-understanding” , And Kaufman criticized syllogism traditionally based on deduction by analogy ... (1) However, what kind of construction does the law of hermeneutics interpret in legal practice? What is the value of the position of learning? Dworkin's criticism and dismantling of the traditional legal theory as well as the legal interpretation of the structure of the excavation gave us a great inspiration and promotion, such as