论文部分内容阅读
对于医疗侵权这类特殊侵权案件,我国从2002年4月1日起开始施行举证责任倒置。当事双方举证能力的差异以及法律的公平价值的实现是实行举证责任倒置的两个主要原因,然而对于倒置后医患双方应承担的举证责任很多人并没有正确地理解;对于实行举证责任倒置的依据很多学者侧重于法理上的研究,鲜有学者从政治史上来寻根问源。医疗侵权举证责任倒置在政治制度史上的实践范例就是中国古代的“风闻言事”制度。
For such special infringement cases as medical torture, our country started to reverse the burden of proof as of April 1, 2002. The difference between the two parties’ ability to prove and the realization of the law’s fair value are the two main reasons for the inversion of the burden of proof. However, many people have not correctly understood the burden of proof for the contracted patients and patients. Inversion of the burden of proof Based on Many scholars focus on the legal research, few scholars from the political history to find root source. The practical example of the reversal of the burden of proof of medical tort in the history of the political system is the ancient system of “anecdote”.