论文部分内容阅读
对于当事人或第三人是否负有勘验协助义务的问题,德国《民事诉讼法》及日本旧《民事诉讼法》均未规定。日本新《民事诉讼法》第233条第1款已经规定准用第223条关于文书的规定,当事人或第三人均有依法院的命令提出勘验物或容忍勘验的义务。我国台湾地区修法后,其“民事诉讼法”第367条已经增列第344条及第348条准用的规定,明示当事人和第三人均负有提出勘验物或容忍勘验的义务,以杜争议。但是,祖国大陆现行立法并未规定鉴定或勘验协助义务,因此确有必要引入鉴定、勘验协助义务以便法院遇有不协助鉴定、勘验时依据证明妨碍原理认定事实。
Neither the parties nor the third party have the obligation to inspect and assist them. Both the German Code of Civil Procedure and Japan’s old Code of Civil Procedure do not stipulate. Article 233, paragraph 1, of Japan’s new Civil Procedure Code already provides for the quasi-use of the provisions of Article 223 with respect to an instrument. Each of the parties or a third party has the obligation to submit the survey or to tolerate the survey under the order of the court. After the revision of Taiwan’s law in Taiwan, Article 367 of its Civil Procedure Law has added the provisions applicable to articles 344 and 348, which expressly states that the parties and the third party have the obligation to submit the survey or to tolerate the inspection To controversy. However, the current legislation of the mother mainland does not provide the obligation of identification or survey assistance. Therefore, it is indeed necessary to introduce identification and investigation assistance obligations so that the court may not be able to assist in the case of the case.