论文部分内容阅读
本文通过对《长沙走马楼三国吴简·嘉禾吏民田家》简牍所载主要经济内容的分析 ,认为该文书的性质是年度户别税钞总计 ,而不是租佃契约文书 ;并探讨了文书中的“丘”与乡里基层政权组织的关系 ,它可能是乡里之下用以标示地名的小自然村、居民点。又对官田出租类别中的“二年常限田”与“余力 (火种 )田”、“旱田”与“熟田”的实际含义进行考证 ;并指明三国孙吴时期官田的地租形态是“按亩计征”的实物定额租。最后通过旱熟田的比例数字 ,说明此时服务于农业生产的水利事业仍处于滞后状态。
Based on the analysis of the main economic elements contained in the brief introduction of “Minjian, Jiahe, Mintikajia, Three Kingdoms in Changsha”, this paper argues that the nature of this instrument is not the tenancy contract instrument but the nature of the instrument, The relationship between “mound” in the paperwork and grass-roots political organizations in the village may be small natural villages or settlements below the village for the purpose of identifying names. The author also carries out research on the actual meaning of “two-year limited fields” and “spare fields”, “dry fields” and “ripe fields” in the official rent categories of Guandian and indicates that the rent form of Guandian in Sun Dynasty is “ According to the plot of mu ”rent quotas in kind. Finally, the proportion of dry farmland, indicating that services to agricultural production at this time of water conservancy is still lagging behind.