论文部分内容阅读
目的探究非机械通气治疗小儿呼吸窘迫综合征的应用。方法选取新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征患儿65例作为观察组,行肺表面活性物质替代治疗+持续气道正压通气治疗,并选取单纯行持续气道正压通气治疗的新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征患儿60例作为对照组,比较两组疗效。结果经治疗,两组疗效比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患儿死亡率为1.5%,对照组为10.0%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患儿吸氧时间、症状缓解时间及住院时间均低于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论非机械通气治疗小儿呼吸窘迫综合征有效,可临床推广使用。
Objective To explore the application of non-mechanical ventilation in treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in children. Methods Sixty-five neonates with respiratory distress syndrome were selected as the observation group. The pulmonary surfactant replacement therapy and continuous positive airway pressure ventilation were selected. A simple neonatal respiratory distress syndrome 60 cases of children as a control group, the two groups were compared. Results After treatment, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). The mortality rate in the observation group was 1.5% and that in the control group was 10.0%. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05). Oxygen inhalation time, symptom relief time and hospital stay in observation group were lower than those in control group, the differences were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Non-mechanical ventilation is effective in treating pediatric respiratory distress syndrome and can be used clinically.