论文部分内容阅读
美国达马斯卡教授的《漂移的证据法》和英国麦克埃文教授的《现代证据法与对抗式程序》两部著作都基于几乎相同的理由论证了英美传统证据规则所面临的挑战,但是这两部著作都没有言明未来的证据法将会向何处发展。从制度层面和哲学层面来看,从证据法学到证明科学是未来证据法的发展趋势;在证据法学向证明科学发展的同时,还应当强调对基本人权的保护。
Both the doctrine of “Evidence of Drift” by Professor Damasca in the United States and the “Law of Modern Evidence of Evidence and Confrontation” by Professor McEvan of the United Kingdom both demonstrate the challenge of the Anglo-American traditional evidence rules based on almost the same grounds. However, Neither of these two books makes any statement as to where the law of evidence in the future will evolve. From the institutional and philosophical perspectives, from the evidence law to the proof science is the development trend of the future law of evidence. While the evidence jurisprudence proves the scientific development, it should also emphasize the protection of basic human rights.