论文部分内容阅读
目的比较腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹手术在子宫肌瘤的临床治疗中的疗效。方法对我院分别接受腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹手术治疗的子宫肌瘤患者的临床治疗进行回顾性分析。将接受腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术的患者作为观察组，而接受传统开腹手术治疗的患者作为对照组，比较两组患者的手术效果。结果观察组患者术中出血量、排气时间及住院时间少于对照组，手术时间多于对照组，术后并发症率低于对照组，差异均具有统计学意义(0.05)。结论在子宫肌瘤的治疗中，腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹手术均具有一定疗效，但是腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术创伤较小、预后较佳，值得推广。“,”Objective To compare efficacy between laparoscopic and laparotomic myomectomy in the treatment of uterine fibroids. Methods Retrospective analysis was used in the patients who received laparoscopic or laparotomic myomectomy in our hospital. The observation group underwent laparoscopic myomectomy while control group received laparotomic myomectomy, and surgical effect was observed respectively.Results Observation group had less blood loss, hospital stay, discharge time, postoperative complications rate but longer operation time than the control group, and the differences were statistically significant ( 0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of uterine fibroids, both laparoscopic and laparotomic myomectomy have a certain effect, but laparoscopic myomectomy is worth to be popularized due toless trauma and better prognosis.