货运代理人之同时履行抗辩权辨析——兼议《最高人民法院关于审理海上货运代理纠纷案件若干问题的规定》第7条

来源 :海大法律评论 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:aaron209
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
海上货运代理人在国际贸易中参与货物的整个运输过程,普遍存在的争议之一就是未成功收取运输相关费用时,货运代理人行使同时履行抗辩权拒绝交付提单及相关运输单证,以促使委托人支付相关费用的合法性问题。《最高人民法院关于审理海上货运代理纠纷案件若干问题的规定》(以下简称《司法解释》)第7条对货运代理人扣留提单及相关运输单证的行为作出了具体规范。本文旨在结合我国《合同法》的相关规定,对货运代理人享有的同时履行抗辩权进行简要探析,并对《司法解释》第7条规定阐述不同意见。 One of the ubiquitous disputes among maritime freight forwarders involved in the entire transport of goods in international trade is that the freight forwarder concurrently performs the defenses to refuse to deliver the bill of lading and the relevant transport documents in the event of unsuccessful collection of the transport related expenses in order to procure the commission People pay the legality of the relevant costs. Article 7 of the Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues concerning the Trial of Maritime Freight Forwarding Dispute Cases (hereinafter referred to as “Judicial Interpretations”) provides specific rules on the detainment of bills of lading and relevant transport documents by freight forwarders. The purpose of this paper is to make a brief analysis of the rights of freight forwarders at the same time in light of the relevant provisions of China’s “Contract Law” and expound different opinions on Article 7 of “Judicial Interpretations”.
其他文献
合同解除权是指合同当事人在法律规定或者合同约定的情况下,享有解除合同的权利,合同解除的法律后果就是合同当事人的权利义务终止。而在解除权成就后,若解除权人未及时行使