为了使判决结果更加符合国情民意,在司法过程中必须考虑对习惯的援用。民初大理院的具体做法可以从其不定期颁制的《大理院判例要旨汇览》中窥见一斑。在援用习惯时,大理院通常会依次从强行法有无明文规定、当事人之间有无合法有效的契约、该习惯是否确实存在并且善良三方面加以考量。而对于商事习惯,大理院的态度则更为积极、肯定。这些无疑都是当下司法领域可以借鉴的宝贵经验。 In order to make the verdict more in line with the conditions of the country and the country, the reference to custom must be considered in the judicial process. The specific practices of the Daliyuan in the early Republic of China can be glimpsed from its “Collection of Jurisdictions of Daliyuan Judicial Probation” issued by him from time to time. When invoking customs, the Daliyuan ordinarily takes into account whether there is a statutory and effective contract between the parties, whether there is a definite existence of the act and whether the habit is good or not, in turn, by whether there is express provision in the compulsory law. For business practices, the attitude of the Dali Yuan is more positive, sure. These are undoubtedly valuable lessons that can be drawn from the current judicial field.