今年年初,一则关于政府巨资采购“天价公共自行车”的报料在媒体上掀起了一阵小小的波澜。虽然当地政府调查后回应称“天价”系误读,一时的喧嚣得以迅速平息。然而,这一被政府定性为“报料人哗众取宠”的事件却也留下了一些疑问:公共自行车系统的成本到底有多高?产生的效益与成本是否一致?有没有更好的替代模式?进一步而言,推动城市绿色交通 Earlier this year, a report on the government’s huge purchase of “high price public bicycle” set off a small wave in the media. Although the local government responded to the survey after saying that “high price ” Department of misreading, the temporary noise quickly subsided. However, this incident, which the government defined as a “reputer’s grandstanding,” left some questions as to how high the cost of a public bicycle system was, and whether the benefits and costs were the same. There was no better alternative Mode? Further, promoting urban green transport