论文部分内容阅读
我国《刑法》第91条(“公共财产”条)、第92条(“公民私有财产”条)看似是对刑法中的财产概念给出了细致、明确的定义,然而如果深入考察可以发现,无论从法条沿革、法条规范结构、法条的司法适用还是从学理进行分析,上述两条条文均难谓具有规范指引意义,而其政治宣示意义随着社会历史以及法律的发展也难谓仍属必要。从司法实践看,上述两条条文不仅无益,而且有害。因此,建议废除《刑法》“公共财产”条、“公民私有财产”条。
Article 91 (“Public Property”) and Article 92 (“Private Property of Citizens”) in our Criminal Law appear to give a detailed and definite definition of the concept of property in criminal law. However, if In-depth study can be found, no matter from the law evolution, normative structure of the law, the judicial application of the law or from the theory of analysis, the above two provisions are difficult to regulate the meaning of meaning, and its significance of political declaration with the social history and law The development is hard to say is still necessary. Judicial practice shows that the above two provisions are not only useless but also harmful. Therefore, it is proposed to repeal the articles of Criminal Law, Public Property, and Private Citizens of Private Property.