论文部分内容阅读
目的比较神经外科锁孔手术和常规骨瓣开颅显微镜手术治疗颅内肿瘤的效果。方法 40例颅内肿瘤患者随机分成对照组和研究组,各20例。对照组施行常规骨瓣开颅显微镜手术治疗,研究组施行神经外科锁孔手术治疗。比较两组手术用时、术中出血量、治疗效果以及并发症情况。结果研究组患者平均手术时间、术中出血量、并发症发生率均低于对照组(P<0.05),治愈率高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论神经外科锁孔手术治疗颅内肿瘤在手术用时、术中出血量、治疗效果、并发症发生率方面均优于常规骨瓣开颅显微镜手术,值得临床推广。
Objective To compare the effects of neurosurgical keyhole surgery and conventional craniotomy microsurgery for the treatment of intracranial tumors. Methods Forty patients with intracranial tumors were randomly divided into control group and study group, 20 cases each. Control group underwent conventional craniotomy craniotomy surgery, the study group performed neurosurgical keyhole surgery. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, therapeutic effect and complication were compared between the two groups. Results The average operation time, intraoperative blood loss and complication rate in study group were lower than those in control group (P <0.05). The cure rate was higher than that in control group (P <0.05). Conclusions Neurosurgical keyhole surgery is superior to conventional craniotomy in the treatment of intracranial tumors during surgery, intraoperative blood loss, therapeutic effect and complication rate, which is worthy of clinical promotion.