论文部分内容阅读
近年来,我国自然哲学界和科学哲学界开展了对对称性和对称性破缺这一对哲学性范畴的讨论,这是很有意义的。然而讨论中有一种把对称性的本体论意义,尤其是对称性的认识论意义强调过分的倾向,忽视甚至抹杀了对称性破缺的本体论和认识论意义。我们认为,在当代科学发展中,尤其是在“新老三论”充分揭示出自然界的演化是有时间箭头的之后,更有力地证明了对称性破缺才是自然进化之源,才是科学认识进化的根本动力,因此它较对称性具有更重要的方法论意义。
In recent years, it is of great significance for our natural and scientific philosophical circles to discuss the philosophical category of symmetry and symmetry breaking. However, there is a tendency in the discussion to emphasize the ontological significance of symmetry, especially the epistemological significance of symmetry, to ignore or even obliterate the ontological and epistemological implications of the broken symmetry. In our view, in the contemporary development of science, especially after the theory of “Neo-Neo-Three” fully reveals that the evolution of nature has the arrow of time, it proves more forcefully that the breaking of symmetry is the source of natural evolution and is the science Recognizing the fundamental motivation for evolution, it has more important methodological implications than symmetry.