论文部分内容阅读
两岸仲裁立法都将自由、效率、公正的价值融会于各自仲裁法的每一个原则、规范、程序之中,但由于政治背景、法律渊源、价值观念的不同,在对自由、效率、公正价值的表现方式、体现程度上各不相同,在一定程度上制约了仲裁功能的发挥。台湾地区的仲裁制度更具国际化和自由性,而大陆的仲裁裁决具有更高的效力和效率,两岸仲裁法均蕴含了法的公正价值,但仍有不足。通过比较分析,相互弥补与借鉴,完善立法,能最大限度地实现仲裁的自由、效率、公正价值。
Arbitration legislation in both sides of the Taiwan Strait merges the values of freedom, efficiency and fairness into the principles, norms and procedures of the respective Arbitration Laws. However, due to the differences in political background, legal origin and values, the freedom, efficiency and fair value The ways of expression and expression are different, which restricted the function of arbitration to a certain extent. Taiwan’s arbitration system is more internationalized and free. However, mainland arbitration awards are more effective and efficient. Both sides of the Arbitration Act contain the fair value of the law, but there are still some deficiencies. Through comparative analysis, complement each other and learn from each other, improve legislation, to maximize the freedom, efficiency and fair value of arbitration.