本文全面研究先秦汉语受事主语句系统,认为目前占主导地位的关于先秦汉语“被动式”的观点,基本脱离先秦汉语实际。1.“于”字式,只是普通意念被动句的一种扩展,“于”字并不负担任何被动信息;2.“见”字式,只是诸遭遇义动词句中的一种,“见”字与其他遭遇义动词在语法功能、语义特点上是完全一致的;3.“为”字式(为(N)V),只是“为”字后面的谓词性成分指称化,转指受事主语的句子中的一部分,其他还有虽转指受事主语但无法认为是被动式的、转指施事的、事物化的等等。这些都是一个统一体的有机组成部分,不宜割裂开来。 In this paper, a comprehensive study of pre-Qin Chinese subject system, that the current predominance of the pre-Qin Chinese “passive ” point of view, basically out of the pre-Qin Chinese. 1. “In ” is a kind of extension of the passive sentence in the ordinary meaning, “in ” does not bear any passive information; 2. “See ” , The word “See” is completely consistent with the grammatical features and semantic features of other encounter verbs; 3. The word “(为 (N) V)” for " The predicate component behind the allegory refers to some of the sentences in the subject of the call, while others refer to the subject of the testimonial but can not be regarded as passive, referring to things, things, and so on. These are all an integral part of the unity and should not be separated.