论文部分内容阅读
各种层次的期刊评价活动已开展多年,对提高我国学术期刊质量和管理水平起到了促进作用。随着期刊评价的深入,分析探讨学术期刊评价的特点很有必要,有助于解决在评价目的、方法和指标体系方面存在的问题。本文从模糊性、潜在性、滞后性、复杂性和导向性五个方面比较系统地分析了学术期刊评价的特点。
Various levels of journal evaluation activities have been carried out for many years, to improve the quality of our academic journals and management has played a catalytic role. With the deepening of periodical evaluation, it is necessary to analyze and discuss the characteristics of academic periodical evaluation so as to help solve the problems existing in the purpose, method and index system of evaluation. This article systematically analyzes the characteristics of academic journals evaluation from five aspects: vagueness, potential, lag, complexity and orientation.