预见性护理在ICU重症颅脑损伤合并糖尿病患者预防压力性损伤中的应用效果

来源 :中国医药指南 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:masonchina
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的 探讨预见性护理应用在ICU 重症颅脑损伤合并糖尿病患者中对预防压力性损伤的效果?方法 将2020年1月至2020年12月于我院治疗的66例ICU 重症颅脑损伤合并糖尿病患者通过抽签(奇偶数)方法分为观察组(33例)与对照组(33例),分别对两组患者实施预见性康复护理(观察组)和常规护理(对照组),比较不同护理的效果?结果 经过不同护理后,观察组(1 例,占3.03%) 合并压力性损伤的发生率明显低于对照组(10 例,占30.30%),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);经过不同护理后,观察组的Br“,”Objective To discuss the effect of predictive nursing in the prevention of stress injuries in ICU patients with severe head injury and diabetes. Methods A total of 66 ICU patients with severe craniocerebral injury and diabetes who came to our hospital from January 2020 to December 2020 were divided into observation group (33 cases) and control group (33 cases) by lottery (odd and even numbers). Carry out predictive rehabilitation nursing (observation group) and routine nursing (control group) to the two groups of patients, and compare the effects of different nursing. Results After different care, the observation group (1 case, accounting for 3.03%) had a significantly lower incidence of combined stress injuries than the control group (10 cases, accounting for 30.30%), and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). After different care, the Braden score of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P <0.05). After the care, the observation group\'s Glass Coma index (GCS) score, acute The improvement of physiology and chronic health status scoring system (APACHE Ⅱ) was significantly better than that of the control group (P <0.05). The ICU hospitalization time of the observation group was significantly shorter than that of the control group. The cost was significantly less than that of the control group (P <0.05). After nursing, the control of fasting blood glucose level, 2h postprandial blood glucose level, and glycosylated hemoglobin level of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group (P <0.05). The nursing satisfaction of the observation group (32 cases, accounting for 96.97%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (26 cases, accounting for 78.79%), and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion For patients with severe craniocerebral injury and diabetes, through predictive rehabilitation nursing intervention can effectively reduce the incidence of stress injury, improve the Braden score, improve the patient\'s coma and health, promote the recovery of the patient, control the overall blood sugar level, and increase satisfaction.
其他文献
目的 分析老年重症肺炎患者护理需求,评价整体护理干预对患者肺功能?生活质量等方面的积极影响,优化护理促进患者康复预后?方法 选择我院2018年8月至2019年8月收治治疗的老年重症肺炎患者(n=104),采取随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组?对照组(n=52)老年重症肺炎患者采取常规护理,观察组(n=52)老年重症肺炎患者配合整体护理干预?比较两组老年重症肺炎患者的护理效果,包括疾病知晓率?护理满意度?院内感染发生率以及肺功能指标改善情况?生活质量状况?症状消失时间?结果 组间护理效果比较,观察组老年重症肺
目的 探讨人性化护理干预在原发性高血压患者护理中的应用价值?方法 将我院2019年1月至2020年1月80例原发性高血压患者,数字表随机法分两组?对照组给予常规护理,试验组实施人性化护理?比较两组护理前后生活质量评分?舒张压和收缩压的监测值?负面情绪水平?护理满意度?结果 护理前两组生活质量评分比较,P>0.05,护理后两组生活质量评分均显著升高,而其中试验组生活质量评分显著高于对照组,P0.05,护理后两组舒张压和收缩压的监测值均显著降低,而其中试验“,”Objective To explore the
目的 讨论结石CT值对经尿道输尿管软镜钬激光碎石治疗肾结石碎石效率?结石清除率及并发症的影响?方法 将2019年2月至2021年5月于我院泌尿外科行经尿道输尿管软镜钬激光碎石治疗的100例肾结石患者作为本次研究对象?所有患者均接受术前CT检查,获取CT值,均接受经尿道输尿管软镜钬激光碎石治疗,并在术后以CT检查结石清除率?结果 100例入选患者术前结石CT值均值为(969.5±237.8)Hu,其中结石CT值<1000Hu与≥1000Hu的分别有55例(55.00%)?45例(45.00%),将其分为甲组
目的 研究患者参与在膀胱癌患者住院治疗期间的应用效果?方法 本文将2020年1月至2020年12月到我科住院治疗的膀胱癌患者作为研究对象,采用随机分为试验组和对照组,每组70例?予以对照组常规护理,试验组在常规护理的基础上增加患者参与的措施?从两组患者的依从性?健康教育知晓率?护理并发症?护理不良事件?护理满意度五个维度收集数据进行比较?结果 患者依从性:试验组依从率为98.57%(69/70),对照组为88.57%(62/70);健康教育知晓率:试验组为99.10%,对照组为91.50%;护理满意度:试