论文部分内容阅读
国际私法发展几百年以来,关于不同国家和地区法律之间的适用选择的冲突一直都存在,反致制度也一直为理论和实践所争议。就目前而言,国际社会对反致的态度也并不明确,完全适用或完全排除适用的国家只占少数。那么到底在冲突规范的运用中,是否应该适用反致制度,如果适用,是否需要加以限制等等问题都需要结合实际进行思考,本文旨在分析反致制度的合理性以及缺陷,并针对性的提出相应的解决方法。
Since the development of private international law for hundreds of years, there have always been conflicts over the applicable choice between different countries and regions. Anti-regime has also been controversial both in theory and in practice. For the time being, the attitude of the international community to the Anti-Troupe is not clear either, and only a minority of countries apply or totally exclude them. In the end, in the application of the conflict norms, whether the system should be applied or not, if applicable, whether it needs to be limited and so on, all need to be considered in light of reality. The purpose of this article is to analyze the rationality and defects of the Anti- Put forward the corresponding solution.