“学术”本来是“学性”与“术性”的总称,合在一起用来表示创新的思想性或创新的旁证价值。自然学科与人文学科有所不同,本文只论人文学科,不涉及自然学科。就人文学科而言,自从学问问世以还,逐渐走入两途:一条路径是创造性地做学问,把本没有的思想、观点表达出来或把尚未被人们注意到的客观规律揭示出来,以飨社会——是为“学性”;另一条路径是做学问的“学问”,将已经被创造出来的学问添枝加叶,让宗派之下生出更细微更具体的宗派(间或揭示前人成果中未被发现的新价值)——是为“术性”。毫无疑问,“学”在前“术”在后,“学”是根本,“术”是枝叶,只有“学”的基础牢固才能让“学术”之树本深末茂,形大声宏,从而使“学”与“术”相得益彰。 “Academic” was originally the general term of “academic” and “technicality” and was used together to represent the innovative ideological value or the circumstantial evidence of innovation. Natural sciences and humanities are different, this article only on the humanities, does not involve the natural sciences. As far as the humanities is concerned, since the advent of learning has come into being, it has gradually gone through two paths: one is to creatively make learning, express its own ideas and opinions, or reveal the objective laws that have not been noticed by people. Society - is “academic”; the other path is “learning” of learning, adding knowledge that has been created to finer and more specific denominational factions (or revealing that previous achievements have not been Discover new value) - is for “surgery”. There is no doubt that “learning” in the former “surgery” in the post, “learning” is the fundamental, “surgery” is the branch, only “learning” based on the solid “academic” So that “learning” and “surgery” complement each other.