论文部分内容阅读
网络问责是一种近年来在中国持续发展并产生重要社会影响的新的问责类型,其“新”在何处值得研究。本文以行政问责实践机制所包含的问责发起机制、启动机制、处理机制为分析纬度,对抽样的135个网络问责事件进行内容分析,检验结果显示,网络问责具有创新内涵,主要体现在对发起机制的议题设置和议题传播运行方式的改变,这两个要素以网络作为活动平台的创新,改变了传统的“呼喊”发起方式,突破了话语表达渠道和空间的限制,实现了议题多对多的传播,推动了公众参与问责活动的发展及影响的扩展,但是,网络问责在问责主体、问责启动机制和处理机制等构成上没有明显变化,仍然受制于传统体制的影响。因此,网络问责只是一种发起方式的创新,而并非问责机制的创新。
Cyber accountability is a new type of accountability that has continued to evolve in China in recent years and has important social implications, and where “new” is worth studying. In this paper, the accountability mechanism, the activation mechanism and the processing mechanism included in the administrative accountability mechanism are used to analyze the latitude. The content analysis is conducted on 135 network accountability cases sampled. The test results show that the network accountability has innovative connotations, In the setting of the agenda of initiating mechanism and the change of mode of operation of propagating issues, these two elements have changed the traditional “shout ” way of initiating with the innovation of network as an activity platform, breaking through the restriction of discourse channels and space to achieve The many-to-many communication of the issues has promoted the development and impact of public participation and accountability activities. However, there is no obvious change in the structure of accountability bodies, accountability starting mechanisms and handling mechanisms, and they are still subject to the traditional The impact of the system. Therefore, cyber accountability is only a kind of initiated innovation, not an innovation of accountability mechanism.