论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨瘢痕子宫妇女再次妊娠后采用不同分娩方式的临床效果,为今后瘢痕子宫产妇分娩提供可靠经验和指导。方法:选择从2011年5月至2012年10月在我院门诊检查并收住入院的120例瘢痕子宫再次妊娠孕妇,将120例再次妊娠产妇平均分为两组,分别是剖宫产组和阴道分娩组,对比两组孕妇产后新生儿窒息情况、产后出血及产后发热等情况。结果:通过统计后发现采用剖宫产组产妇在平均产后出血量、新生儿窒息等方面与阴道分娩组差异不大,但和初产妇剖宫产之间差距较多。结论:瘢痕子宫妇女再次妊娠后可以采用阴道分娩方式分娩,在分娩前后做好准备工作和产妇心理疏导,值得临床使用。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of different modes of delivery after scar pregnancy in pregnant women with uterine scar, and to provide reliable experience and guidance for the future delivery of scar-shaped uterus. Methods: From May 2011 to October 2012 in our hospital outpatient examination and admission admission of 120 cases of uterine scar pregnancy again pregnant women, the 120 cases of second trimester pregnant women were divided into two groups were cesarean section and Vaginal delivery group, compared two groups of postpartum neonatal asphyxia, postpartum hemorrhage and postpartum fever and so on. Results: After statistical analysis, we found that there was no significant difference between the cesarean section group and vaginal delivery group in terms of average postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal asphyxia and so on. Conclusion: After uterine scar pregnancy, vaginal delivery can be used again after pregnancy, and preparation and maternal psychological counseling before and after delivery are worthy of clinical use.