论文部分内容阅读
“荷马与赫西俄德的竞赛”是古希腊遗留下来的一份佚名残篇。尼采在莱比锡大学求学时就曾经对之进行过校勘,1870年尼采写了《关于荷马与赫西俄德的佛罗伦萨论文》第一部分以及第二部分,1872年又续写了第三至第五部分。在实证主义语文学家眼中,尼采的这篇考据文章是他对古典学做出的最大贡献。其重要意义甚至超过了同时期的名著《悲剧的诞生》。《悲剧的诞生》里有太多无法被证实和证伪的洞见,因此很难有被引证的价值。而《关于荷马与赫西俄德的佛罗伦萨论文》却不同,它是严格的实证主义语文学的产物。在这篇文章中尼采不仅论证了“荷马与赫西俄德的竞赛”这份佚名文章源于阿尔西达马斯修辞学教学残篇的可能性,还极其严谨地推测出了赫西俄德死亡的原因、时间、地点,最大限度地还原了当时的谋杀场景。此文迄今依然对古典学研究有着重要的影响。本期刊发第1-2节。
“Homer and Hersheyd race ” is an anonymous residue left by ancient Greece. Nietzsche had collated it while studying at the University of Leipzig. In 1870 Nietzsche wrote Parts I and II of the Florence Paper on Homer and Hersheyd, and in the third and fifth editions in 1872 section. In the eyes of positivist linguists Nietzsche’s test paper is his greatest contribution to classical studies. Its significance even surpassed the famous book “The Birth of Tragedy” of the same period. Too many insights that can not be confirmed or falsified in The Birth of a Tragedy make it difficult to cite the value. The “Florence essay on Homer and Hersheyd” is different, however, and is a product of a rigorous positivist linguistics. Nietzsche in this article not only demonstrates the possibility of the “Homer vs. Hersheyd Contest,” an anonymous essay based on the teaching of Arsis Damas’s rhetoric, but also extraordinarily predicts The reason, time and place of the death of West Germany finally restored the murder scene at the time. This article so far still has an important impact on the study of classical. Issue 1-2 of this issue.