论文部分内容阅读
【目的】为其他英文科技期刊编辑选择合适、准确的审稿专家提供参考借鉴。【方法】以《中国化学快报》为例,介绍英文科技期刊编辑快速选择合适、准确的“小同行”评审专家的途径和原则。【结果】通过选取编委/青年编委、利用已有的审稿专家库、利用网络数据库、作者推荐、其他专家推荐或者学者自荐等途径,英文科技期刊编辑可以为稿件选到合适的专家审稿。【结论】建立并及时维护审稿专家库,全面掌握审稿专家信息,可以提高审稿效率和期刊质量。
【Objective】 To provide reference for other editors in English science and technology to choose suitable and accurate reviewers. 【Method】 Taking “China Chemical Express” as an example, this paper introduces the ways and principles for English editors to quickly select the appropriate and accurate “peer” reviewing experts. [Results] By selecting the editorial board / youth editorial board, making use of existing referee database, using network database, author recommendation, other experts’ recommendation or scholarly recommendation, editors of English sci-tech periodicals can select suitable experts draft. 【Conclusion】 Establishing and maintaining expert reviewers’ library in a timely manner and fully grasping the information of reviewers can improve the efficiency of peer review and the quality of journals.