首先,新意是专著和论文的生命线。然而,时下某些冠以“学术专著”的大小部头,虽字数“煌煌”十几万、数十万,但其观点却大都因袭旧谱、拾人牙慧,倘剔除冗笔,榨干水分,所余“创新”部分恐怕用放大镜也难以寻觅。你说,这种装腔作势、拉大旗作虎皮、“白白耗费读者生命”的“专著”,比得上一篇字字珠玑、句句锦绣、精彩纷呈、新意迭出的论文么? First, new ideas are the lifeblood of monographs and dissertations. However, nowadays, some of the large and small sections entitled “academic monographs”, although the number of “Huang Huang” is hundreds of thousands and hundreds of thousands, most of their views are due to the old spectrum, picking up wisdom and wisdom. I am more than “innovation” part is also difficult to find with a magnifying glass. You say that this poser, pulling the banner for the tiger skin, “monotonous consumer life,” “monographs” comparable to a word rubbish, beautiful sentence, brilliant, brilliant ideas of the thesis?