论文部分内容阅读
与儒学并称先秦显学的墨学一度成为绝学,对于其创始者墨子的生卒年判断,历来学界众说盛行,各自为据。尤以孙诒让《墨子年表》的说法影响至深。深究之,却尚存疑点。重新梳理墨子生卒年的相关史实根据,以公输盘、鲁阳文公、巫马子为参照系进行考察,对墨子生年所得出的结论大体一致,试判定墨子应当生于公元前520-510年期间,晚于孔子三十到四十年。关于墨子卒年已经无法落实,仅有材料表明,直到周考王二年(前439),时值楚惠王五十年,墨子仍然健在,以年近八十的高龄再次南游到达楚国朝廷。
And Confucianism and pre-Qin Xiangyu school of mathematics and said that once became a must-have, for its founder Mozi’s birth and death judge, historians have always been popular, each based on. Especially Sun 诒 let “Mozi Chronology” argument profound. Deep down, but still doubtful. To reorganize the historical data of the birth and death of Mozi, based on the reference of the public transport plate, Lu Yang Wen Gong and Wu Mazi, the conclusion drawn by Mozi’s birth year is generally consistent. The trial decided that Mozi should be born in 520- 510 years later than Confucius thirty to forty years. About the Mozi year has been unable to implement, only material shows that until week two Wang Nian (439), when the value of Chu Hui Wang fifty years, Mozi is still alive, with nearly 80 years of age again South arrived Chu court.