论文部分内容阅读
目的 比较和评价支撑喉镜下切除声带息肉和纤维喉镜下激光治疗声带息肉效果。方法 5 3例声带息肉患者 2 6例采用支撑喉镜下切除 ,2 7例采用纤维镜下激光治疗。结果 支撑喉镜下切除声带息肉的治愈率为 84 .8% ,有效率为 96 .2 % ;纤维喉镜下激光治疗的治愈率为 81.5 % ,有效率为 92 .6 %。两组差异无显著性意义 (P>0 .0 5 )。支撑喉镜下切除声带息肉术后并发牙痛 2例 ,上切牙脱失一例 ,纤维喉镜下激光治疗未见并发症。结论 纤维喉镜下激光治疗声带息肉具有痛苦小、快速简捷、经济实惠的优点
Objective To compare and evaluate the effect of vocal cord polyps with laryngoscope excision of vocal cord polyp and laryngoscope laser. Methods Twenty-six patients with vocal cord polyps underwent laryngoscope resection and 27 underwent laser treatment with fiberoscope. Results The cure rate of vocal cord polyps with supportive laryngoscope was 84.8% and the effective rate was 96.2%. The cure rate of laser laryngoscope was 81.5% and the effective rate was 92.6%. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05). There were 2 cases of recurrent laryngoscope excision of vocal cord polyp followed by toothache, one case of upper incisor ablation and no laser complication under fiber laryngoscope. Conclusions Fiber laryngoscope laser treatment of vocal cord polyps is less painful, quick and simple, and has the advantages of cost-effectiveness