中美药品技术评价体系比较

来源 :中国新药杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:dhamma
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
对研发药物的安全有效性和质量可控性做出科学合理的评价,以更好地为促进国民健康用药服务,是我国药品评价者需要不断深入思考的课题。而借鉴国外药品评价历程中的实践经验为我所用,是提高评价水平的有效方式。现对美国和我国药品技术评价体系中的异同点进行比较,旨在促进我国药品评价体系的完善,不断提高评价水平;同时也引导药品研发者有的放矢,提高研发效率。 To scientifically and reasonably evaluate the safety and effectiveness of research and development of drugs and quality controllability so as to better serve the promotion of national health drug use is a topic that our drug evaluators need to continuously think in depth. It is an effective way for me to improve the evaluation level by referring to the practical experience in the evaluation process of foreign drugs for my own use. The similarities and differences between the United States and China in the drug technology evaluation system are compared to promote the improvement of the drug evaluation system in our country and constantly improve the evaluation level. Meanwhile, the drug developers are also targeted to improve the R & D efficiency.
其他文献
目的:了解广州部分社区中老年人群的吸烟和健康状况,探讨吸烟与慢性疾病的关系,为今后的社区卫生服务提供依据。方法:整群随机抽样40岁以上的居民2000人,进行问卷调查。结果:
文中根据作者对我国新药研发的认识和理解,提出了新药研发过程中me-too,me-better和menew类新药的概念,并对新药研发过程中的这3类创新活动之间的关系、新药研发的创新程度与